Depth 1.16.2025
Last week we discussed the stratification of snow-ice-snow in the recent winter storm in Southeastern Illinois. The point I made last week is that details matter. The different layers of the precipitation that fell created a complex and dangerous mix that was due more to the details of the storm than anything else. The natural next step is to consider depth. The details of the storm created circumstances of difficulty that were worse than mere depth. How it fell was more significant that merely measuring amount. And after a week those details still play havoc with digging out.
We had more snow on Friday and Saturday. Perhaps 6-7 inches. That additional depth didn’t make the problem worse. That snowfall was light and relatively easy to move. That depth, added to what had already accumulated was easier to move and by itself, did not constitute much of a difficulty. It was the earlier storm, with its greater variety which was the real problem. The details accumulated with greater depth, but not all depth is as deep, and not all details are created equal.
And so, it goes with this admixture of detail and depth when we use that model in analyzing our preaching. How detailed should we be and how deep should we go? In our age of easily accessible turn-key preaching systems which require the preacher to do no more than assimilate and regurgitate the work of others this question is out of order. Yet for those pastor-scholars who still make their own soup it is essential and multifaceted. There are at least two applications to consider. The depth of our own study, and the depth of our preaching.
Depth of Study
There are easy and difficult approaches to most endeavors. This is true of what goes on in your study. You may approach the task in such a fashion that you create more chaos and move more slowly than you should. Do not confuse making easy things difficult with actually doing difficult things. They are not the same and making a clear distinction will give sound initial guidance when deciding how deep to go in study.
I advocate doing hard things. If you are preaching from 1 Peter, you should become an expert on 1 Peter. This will take hard work and some of it is difficult. You will need to consider backgrounds, language, social setting, chronology, and theological issues. You will need to spend long uninterrupted time digesting the relevant secondary materials and week by week you must do the detailed work of exegesis. By the time you get 3/4 of your way through the book the burden will ease as you draw from your own recently stocked well of information. It won’t be easy, but it will be worth it.
Far too many preachers approach their work like last week’s winter storm. Three days of prediction followed by three days of affliction. They become frustrated and burned out. The very work they were called to do has become exhausting because they allowed themselves to become buried in details and overwhelmed by the rising depth. How can this be avoided? The answer requires me to mount some favorite hobby horses. Plan ahead. Break the work down into manageable portions. Determine early which details matter. Have a system. Start early. If the water is over your head, it is too late to learn how to swim.
If you are consistent, methodical, and disciplined you will learn to manage the details and assess how deep you can go in a given study for preaching from a particular book, section of scripture, or topic. If you reinvent the methodical wheel for every series or message, there is little that can be done other than trying to resuscitate you after you go under.
Depth of Preaching.
So, having done a thorough job, accumulating a new depth of knowledge on 1 Peter, how much do you take into the pulpit? As much as it takes to communicate the message. You must now learn to become the judge of how deep your own people can go. Good preaching distills for the pulpit what goes on in the study. It requires a pastoral touch and a willingness to engage in basic audience analysis. Are there many who are unregenerate? What is the maturity level of the congregation? Do you have people who consider themselves experts who are actually out of their depth? Preaching is pastoral work written large. It is from the pulpit that disciples are discipled. The modern notion that discipleship is individualized, personalized, and nontransferable is silly nonsense.
Every book in the New Testament was intended to be heard and absorbed by the group. Flock-formation is what gives other pastoral tasks context. There will be exceptions of course, but the modern Church has made attending to personal (selfish) needs of the individual the benchmark of discipleship and the negative impacts are clear. The purpose of the Church is to make disciples not mollify the marginally involved.
Your preaching should reflect deep, detailed study adequately and correctly prepared for teaching, exhorting, correcting, and guiding your congregation. Not only does that make for good sermons it provides a basis for long-term sustainable ministry. People will know what to expect and even when you are preaching from familiar texts you will be able to engage people to a depth that challenges them to grow. Much contemporary preaching is nothing but cheerleading. For those who are already growing and have some capacity to feed themselves it stokes the fires for another week of service. For those who cannot feed themselves it is a missed opportunity. They go away encouraged but they have not been given proper tools for continuing growth. Every person who comes to Church deserves preaching which takes them as deep as they are ready to go. That requires a preacher to go into the deep end to gather materials and then to synthesize his learning into clear, understandable messaging. It is time for the Lord’s Church to get out of the kiddie end of the pool