Horsing Around Essay for 8.20.2026

     Preaching connects people with God through the clear, accurate teaching of Scripture. While all preaching should be accurate and strive for clarity, the connecting part is where we often run aground. 

    There are a couple of reasons. First, some preachers sacrifice clarity for connection. They are all about the congregations preconceived notions of spirituality, culturally derived identity markers, or psychologically satisfying distractions. We’re not talking about that sort of preaching. It is so anchored in the audience and its perceived needs that it is virtually impossible for it to be Biblically clear and accurate. There are many things in Scripture that are opaque and many things in Scripture that challenge our self-understanding. This sort of preaching may grow churches, but it doesn’t result in maturing disciples. 

    A second issue is preaching that never thinks about the congregation at all.  It is so accurate that clarity becomes difficult if not impossible. It fails to translate the realities of the ancient text into manageable categories of the contemporary world. 

    Neither of these scenarios produces connection which often results in a Shakespearian tragedy or a Kafkaesque comedy. Some church “leaders” even wonder if the time for preaching is past. The problem is that the thing they question isn’t really preaching. It leaves out the purpose of the endeavor in the first place; connection. 

    Our question then, is how do we bridge this gap? How do we make a connection with our listeners when they have both eyes on phone, tablet, or computer? How do we get a hearing amid the cacophony of contemporary society? The quick answer? You’re going to have to get better. The long answer? I’m glad you asked.

    Let’s consider the question before us using the metaphor of horses. I like horses. I watch a lot of horse racing. There is nothing more beautiful than the moment when a Thoroughbred racehorse begins to reach forward, pins its ears, and extend its neck to attain full speed. That is but one kind (we’re not focused on breeds) of horse. And when it comes to preaching, it is the first of several poor models. Consider the following “stable” if you will. Some of these horses should be permanently put out to pasture if we wish to truly improve our preaching. 

Racehorses

    There are some preachers who see the study as a racecourse. They enter the starting stalls (perpetually worried about more important things in their ministry, as if ministry had more important tasks than preaching) chomping at the bit to work as fast as they possibly can to complete the course. They want to get that sermon done ASAP.  In this case, finishing should not mean fast, it should mean best possible. 

    Racehorse preachers write sermons so fast that they have no time for editing, redrafting, reframing, rethinking, or reconsidering anything. Racehorse preachers perpetually preach first drafts and work from a vocabulary limited by their haste. 

    It takes time to connect with culture. It takes time to understand what is going on in the world. It takes careful observation to grasp the real problems amid the articulated complaints of the modern world. It can’t be done quickly. Every sermon is different but each one draws upon our entire life’s experience to frame it and tint it with color. Racehorse preaching is so intent on finishing that the jockey (I apologize for mixing the metaphor) flails away frantically when, as they say, the horse has come off the bit. 

    We need to retire the Racehorse. We don’t finish our sermon first among our tasks of the week because it is of least (or secondary) importance but because it is the most important task of the week and deserves our best energy. We need stamina to make many passes through the text cutting, trimming, adding, editing, and refining the message so that the message given to us by God’s Holy Spirit reflects the tale told in the text impacting the story in the pew. 

High Horses

    Too many preachers have a list of materials they won’t read, places they won’t go, movies they won’t see, or restaurants where they won’t eat. Generally, this self-selected intellectual ghetto is the result of the next kind of horse—the High Horse. And as you might guess my advice is simple. Dismount. If possible, take it out back and forever release it into the wild. If absolutely necessary, put it down. The preacher who begins his work by declaiming all the things she won’t do, places he won’t, go books he won’t read, or music she won’t listen to--needs to take a good, hard look at a little thing called…the Gospels.

    Read everything. Even what makes you uncomfortable. Listen to a wide variety of music. When you hear a song that strikes you as odd or even culturally significant listen to it intently, google the artist, find out where they are coming from. Go into interesting, unique stores and boutiques that cater to tastes different than yours. Cinema, streaming platforms, social media, comedians, are other cultural bell-weathers. If you don’t know where the culture is, what the pressure points are, what specific issues are becoming sinfully debilitating how will you address the culture and say what it needs to hear?

Generally High Horses are either excuses or disguises. 

Hobby Horses

    The next threat is the Hobby Horse. These are the topics, themes, tropes, or concepts that we use so frequently that we beat them—even after the horse is dead. Hobby Horses are often stabled alongside racehorses and high horses. Hobby horses distract us from exegetical and hermeneutical heavy lifting and astute cultural observation. 

    There are many important truths in Scripture. People need to know them all, but some need to be better known than others. A couple of years ago I preached a book sermon from the Song of Solomon. I announced to the congregation that I’d not likely ever preach from that book again. Yes, it’s Scripture, but there are more essential truths to be covered in my limited remaining time.  Choose wisely where you will focus. Make sure that your life’s work is not a mere list of Hobby Horses that you can’t get off your mind. 

    The best antidote to saddling up Hobby Horses is to preach exegetical, expository preaching. If you want to take a more topical approach to your broader calendar, fine just make sure you are always operating “text-egetically” explaining and applying the clear meaning of scripture. Most Hobby Horse preaching begins with the congregation and what it “might need.” When you begin with the text it will determine the emphasis. 

Plow Horses

    What we really need is plow horses. They are not as sleek as racehorses, require more depth than high horses, have greater impact than hobby horses. Plow horses work. Plow horses are harnessed up to get the job done. They may move slowly but they are efficient and effective. 

    Generally, plow horses, after a few years know the job so well that they don’t need lots of direction. They saddle themselves up (It’s a metaphor for crying out loud!) and get to work. They recognize that some fields require different levels of work than others. They are not offended or frightened by diverse kinds of work because they know that is simply how the world is. Plow horses bend the neck, waste little energy, and get the job did. 

    What the Church needs right now are plow horses. Racehorses, High Horses, and Hobby Horses are all varieties of prima donnas. They are more focused on self than service. They have many definitions of failure and are risk averse. Plow horses have no pride. They just work. 

    The scenario I am sketching here is not only a full-time job—it’s your life. Preachers are always grazing for material. We are always looking for solid, contemporary, culturally relevant connections. That means we need our ears and eyes to be attuned to the culture.

Thoughts 8.13.2026

     I mentioned last week that when I need refreshed that thinking and reading help me to get my edge back. Five novels in the last 4 days. Check! Now, about the thinking. Stuff happens. I had hoped to spend some sequestered time in the easy chair in my study. Alas, there were places to go and people to see. Where and when does one find time to let the mind wander? How does one find the opportunity to ease the mental tension. Briefly, a couple of suggestions.

    First, you can think when you are driving. I had to make a trip to the city (Evansville) last Monday. I worked through some preaching and pastoral issues that needed thought through. The only caveat is that one should not take notes when one is driving. I was able to mentally review some of the highlights that would be written up in my board report and even to “game plan” some approaching sermon/writing issues. 

Second, I did some personal reviewing. I’ve spoken and written about this periodically, but I did a deeper, more specific dive this week. The longer you preach and teach the more of your own material you squirrel away. I know that I will be writing a funeral sermon over the next couple of days—and I’m not interested in repeating entire sermons. I am, however, culling my previous sermons for turns of phrase, expressions, sequence of words that can be used in other contexts. In some contexts, this would be called “boilerplate” text. I’d like to think it is a bit more than that. What I am trying to assemble is well-written prose that can be re-purposed. If I was looking at the work of others, I would be clipping usable quotations that could be used and cited. The only difference is that it is my own work that I’m considering. Here is an example from a previous funeral message that will be suitable in many other contexts. 

“The Goal: 

       Guide you with Scripture,

            Focus on Christ, 

                  Give you hope,

                       Provide perspective,

                           Remind you of the Promise

                                   of Eternal life.”

    That’s exactly how it looks on the page. It is a transitional section; I’m simply stating to the congregation what my purpose is in preaching this (funeral) sermon at this moment. An additional goal is to ensure that I don’t promise too much. I’m there to use scripture to talk about the hope we have in Jesus. That’s the focus of a funeral message. 

    I know that there are many other well written phrases in the thousands of pages I have written. It is a more direct and practical sort of thinking than I had originally intended but it is different in focus than weekly work. The fact is that we have to relax as best we can. Sleep in a little, find a satisfactory diversion, get a good night’s sleep and continue with the mission.

Refreshment 8.6.2026

    Last week was busy with camp and other pastoral and professional issues, so it is good to be back to a more normal routine. Mrs. Beckman and I are pretty much homebodies. For me that means coming down from the Parsonage on the Hill to spend time in my study which is my home away from home. The times and places flow according to my normal routines, but the work is not coming quite as easily this week. 

    As you might guess there was a lot of catching up to do. And I still seem to be having some difficulty   fighting off long-term fatigue. While I may not be flailing per se, I’m also taking a bit longer to get my “chores” done. I don’t like to get off schedule, but I am getting a bit bogged down this week by issues which should not be so tiresome. Some of you might think “It’s because you’re getting old!” Which may be true. A part of it also comes down to a no time for the kind of work I find refreshing.

    Refreshing work consists of things that you not only enjoy but that you also find invigorating They get the blood flowing. They get you engaged. They connect different parts of your brain and help to create intellectual and spiritual alignment.  

     With your permission of course, let me share a couple of things with you that I find refreshing during times like these. To help recalibrate the gray matter for the more important work. 

 Read

    How helpful can it be, how relaxing and refreshing to read—when your job revolves around reading and writing? Very helpful indeed if you find something different to absorb your attention for a brief time. I have collected a nice little stash of novels to read which I expect to help restore my edge. 

    Novels? Why? How? To what end? Yes. Because they combine entertainment and engagement. To what end? Getting the ol’ motor running. I’ve still got work percolating along, but when the mental engine backfires it is time to provide different fuel. 

    I am pretty promiscuous when it comes to reading. I like history, biography, novels, historical fiction. This is not a good time to be too picky—though I do have a particular author and focus for the rest of the summer. Most of this material will yield no notes—no pithy quotations, no memorable anecdotes. Reading is better than most movies and it keeps the blood flowing in the brain. I also like cinema. However, when you’re tired movies can provide too great an opportunity to simply fall asleep. 

Think

    “Don’t you think when you study? When you prepare? As you preach?” Yes. Yes. And Yes. Not all thinking is created equal. When fatigued you need to relax the intellectual muscles without relying on the sugary sweets of TV and social media. Mrs. Beckman and I do have certain shows we like to watch, and I like entertaining movies, but sometimes you just need to think. Maybe doodle a little, nothing too complicated. Maybe a brief, squiggly outline something simple while using your brain to do the thing it was created for—thinking. 

    As ministers we are generally either dipping the bucket into the well or filling the well. We pour things in; we draw things out. In, out. In, out. Every week. The study provides material for our life’s work. The sermon or lesson the is the weekly embodiment of that work. We have both input and output. What about the process that moves us from the study to the pulpit? It’s not automatic. It should be thoughtful, intentional, directed, and purposeful. Yet much of the time we are so deadline driven that we have no time for the creative intellectual play that is essential for continued growth. Don’t get me wrong. We need to be ready for Sunday’s sermon or Thursday’s article. However, at some point the well we have filled to overflowing will begin to get cloudy and stagnant because we are filling and drawing but never stirring. Thinking is stirring the water’s so that they don’t grow murky or cloudy. 

And with that…I’m off to clear the water with a novel. Cheers.

Origins 7.30.2026

     Most of my post-college life I have had a pocket copy of the US Constitution. Though it is not a document of divine origin, in no way scriptural or inherently moral, it is the “rule book” for the American Experiment, and this a good thing to know. The Constitution is a political blueprint for a new kind of nation. This very human document, like all writing, was a creature of the time of its composition.  But because the founders were pretty smart, it included the processes for its own expansion and emendation. 

    My interest is the exegesis and application of scripture, so I thought you might be wondering “Why these thoughts on Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit?” I wanted to provide a couple of lines about the origins of this month’s writing, and it comes back to that old, now lost copy of the constitution and a new copy I recently obtained. 

    If you follow anything I write you know I am a big notebook carrier and note-taker. My brand is Field Notes notebooks. There are two current (big and small) books on my desk right now, along with a desk diary and a stack of filled books I keep around for reference. Also, there is the box of a new notebook design from the Field Notes folk that I only purchased because it came with a premium copy of The Founding Documents: The Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States. So, the genesis of this July’s writing was a consideration of some of the cardinal thoughts of the founding documents of the USA, in light of parallel Biblical vocabulary. One might think of this as applied theology. I would also describe it as nitty-gritty theology. 

    The 250th birthday of our country came at the beginning of the month. Just about the time that my copy of the Founding Documents arrived. I browsed through them, hit some of the highlights and reflected on some of the core elements which are often thought to derive from a Biblical mindset. The 18th century may not have had the internet but that does not mean that it was not a connected and complex society. The 13 colonies were highly literate and filled with men who had drunk deeply at the well of the Enlightenment. The colonies were also an experimental hodgepodge of theological reflection and religious practice. Some of the colonies (Massachusetts) had and would continue to have established (that is tax-supported State) Churches until the 19th century. Other colonies (Pennsylvania) were founded with no State Church and full freedom of religion. In all the colonies there were “freethinkers” and devout believers everywhere. Sometimes both extremes existed in the same person. 

    Reading these documents reminds us that the past is truly a different country and we must go there warily lest we carry the baggage of our own prejudices back with us. A national birthday celebrates both the achievements of the past and the possibilities of the future. But the celebration is right now. We can afford neither to fritter away the accumulated wisdom of the past nor steal the unknown achievements of the future. We must live here. We must live now. 

For the believer it is a question of balance. I come back over and again to the second century letter to Diognetus…

“They live in their own countries, but as aliens. They share in everything as citizens and endure everything as foreigners. Every foreign country is ⌊their country⌋, and every country is foreign.” Rick Brannan, trans., The Apostolic Fathers in English (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012).

    Sometimes I fear that the contemporary Church has lost this balance. We have become too comfortable.  I am afraid that we wish, not to blend in but to edit out the complexity, variety, and diversity of the world. The choice between cowardice and conquest is not one that Jesus offers nor endorses. I am afraid that we have mistaken a profound blessing for a new purpose. The purpose of the Church is unaltered. It doesn’t matter if you live in Alabama, Illinois, Albania, Italy, or Washington DC. Our job is to make disciples, proclaim the gospel, lift Jesus, care for the broken, pursue the Kingdom. The Bible is the Kingdom document. Not the Constitution. Let’s let the last word come from Jesus. 

“But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.” (Matthew 6:33 ESV)

Pursuit 7.23.2026

     We are all familiar with the concept “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of______.” I leave the final clause blank because filling it will be the topic of this essay. Life is relatively easy to define. And though elusive, liberty a topic that all humans hold dear. It is this pursuit which bedevils us. 

    As derived from both enlightenment thinking and English common law tradition the third part of this triad (Jefferson may have leveraged it but he didn’t invent it) was generally some kind of a property clause. However, for the founders such a seemingly grasping concept did not come across as a thoughtful reason for separating from the King. I suppose it would have sounded like “Keep your hands, royal or otherwise off of our stuff!” And of course, the distinctive economies of the various sections of the country were founded on different, though interlocking economic realities. 

    Better to round off these “inalienable” human rights with one that seemed acceptable to all reasonable people. Of course, the unfolding history of our nation reminds us repeatedly that maybe these “rights” to property were more of a motivating force towards liberty than we are comfortable acknowledging. 

    The Confederacy was certainly founded upon the notion that the pursuit of southern liberty was predicated upon specific property rights. The notion that these three rights were more alienable for some than others, though avoided in the declaration, it was certainly made clear in the maudlin mathematics of the Constitution (3/5ths). 

    Subsequent developments from the gilded age to the jazz age, to the digital age confirm that for every poor soul who wanted to be happy there were many more who wanted to get rich. For those whose happiness is primarily found in the pursuit of property there are very few other rules. It is amazing how many people revere the words of Jefferson and his colleagues and hide behind a facade of Christianity whilst being wholly ignorant of some Jesus’ central teachings. Ignorant, or willfully blind—it works both ways. If you are a believer, the following words should resonate with you. 

“Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.” (Matthew 6:19-21 ESV)

    Christian people since the very earliest days of the Church have been reconciled to the fact that our life, our liberty, and our pursuits must be subservient to and derived from our life in Christ. If not, then they are temporary at best and blinding distractions at worst. 

    The American Church must do a better job of making a distinction between our tremendous blessings to be living in such a wealthy and powerful country and the realization that it has no eternal significance. In fact, if we are not careful, we will find that we begin to amass earthly treasures vulnerable to time, decay, and intrusion. When we consider this question “What is most important to me? What do I pursue?” we need to make sure that the choice is informed more by the gospel than the good chance of our physical location. 

    We must also be aware that a misguided pursuit—for riches, power, position, or influence can very quickly move from damaged desire to misdirected decisions and actions

“My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory. For if a man wearing a gold ring and fine clothing comes into your assembly, and a poor man in shabby clothing also comes in, and if you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, “You sit here in a good place,” while you say to the poor man, “You stand over there,” or, “Sit down at my feet” have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts? Listen, my beloved brothers, has not God chosen those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to those who love him? But you have dishonored the poor man. Are not the rich the ones who oppress you, and the ones who drag you into court? Are they not the ones who blaspheme the honorable name by which you were called? If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well.” (James 2:1-8 ESV)

 James is merely citing circumstances where the pursuit, freed from biblical, theological, and moral restraint had flipped the gospel completely around! James understood that when the Church is filled with speculators who have invested the treasure of their life in the things of this world. They may win in the prediction market but lose in the sanctification market. 

    Where are you investing the great treasures that Jesus has provided to you? Are you hoarding and hiding them or using them to bless others? This goes beyond money—some will always have more than others—what of your time, your abilities, and your kindness? 

    The words of the declaration are a fine reflection, a good beginning for our great political experiment. They are also a great point of departure for thinking about issues that are far more important. How am I using my redeemed life? Do I squander my liberty in Christ pursuing my own self-interest? Am I living in dogged pursuit of material wealth or investing for eternity? It’s your treasure. Choose well.

Liberty 7.16.2026

    Virtually every human person has their own definition of liberty. In each individual’s mind he or she is at the very center of everything. The most popular definition of liberty would go something like this. “I can think, say, and do anything I wish at any time, with absolutely no external restraint.” For most civilized people this doesn’t sound like liberty—it sounds like license. Yet for much of human history these two seeming opposites were more closely related than what we moderns would find comfortable. 

    Last week’s look at life was comparatively easy! Everyone who has life wishes to keep it and maximize it. Yet, even in the third decade of the 21st century the masses of people throughout history who lived without any conception of liberty still dwarfs those who have had liberty. For the human community, defining and delimiting itself, liberty may be the canary in the coal mine that not only didn’t die—it hardly ever lived! 

    Which is why a discussion of liberty that does not begin with and then focus on our universal captivity to sin is liable to miss the point. Consider what Jesus says in John 8.32 

“and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”” (John 8:32 ESV)

 He certainly knew that those words resonated differently in the various segments of His audience. Some would have thought themselves already free in mind and conscious, even if they were actual members of the servile class. (Slaves) Others would have been offended. Against well understood “objective history” those contending with Jesus replied to what Jesus said with

“They answered him, “We are offspring of Abraham and have never been enslaved to anyone. How is it that you say, ‘You will become free’?”” (John 8:33 ESV)

    Which is just silly—they knew better! Half of the Hebrew Bible is about getting into, though, or out of slavery, exile, or vassalage. It’s not just that it wasn’t true, the boast was hollow and self-serving. They were in an argument, and they were reaching for whatever stick was at hand to win the argument regardless of its truthfulness.  Listening Roman soldiers or Herod’s henchmen overhearing this claim probably chuckled. This doesn’t even consider other listeners who may have had extended family members living in Persia, who had stayed put after the exile ended. 

    You will notice that I am substituting freedom for “liberty” in this discussion. The use of the word “liberty” in the NT is a bit problematic. It is, at least in my favored version, rarely used  and translates several terms from different semantic domains. And when people speak candidly what they really want and they truly mean when they use terms like liberty, is freedom. 

    Even then, too many people do not understand that the real freedom Jesus discusses, the freedom—liberty if you will—that we really need has nothing to do with politics. The real freedom we need, now and always, is freedom from sin. And this salvation that Jesus offers, the salvation grounded in His own person and work is not restricted by nation, state, race, or background. The audience for His gospel expresses this universal need. 

    Jesus’ servant Paul was obviously not present when Jesus spoke the words recorded in John 8.  At that point in his life, however, he surely agreed with the sentiment expressed by those arguing with Jesus. Paul was proud of his racial/religious heritage and considered himself no man’s slave. He was filled with pride and loathing for those far less pure than he. I’m sure that the Saul we first meet—breathing fire and fury against the Church would have agreed against all evidence that he and his people had never been enslaved to anyone. It is interesting that he seizes on this imagery to describe the outcome of this freedom we gain through Jesus…

“For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Romans 6:23 ESV) 

    

Clearly, this was not the thrust of the founders. This is not what the meant by liberty. Their goal was founding a republic. Their purpose in declaring their “liberty” was freedom from external rule by what had become a foreign power. That freedom, wonderful as it is, is far different in kind and separate in function from the freedom we have in Christ. 

    All residents of this nation are covered by the freedoms guaranteed in our founding documents. Social and political liberty have a limited and parochial reach. Outside of the USA the Constitution may be an admirable statement but it is not foundational. 

     Many of those politically liberated people, free to “live their best life”, are still slaves to sin. The liberty they enjoy may lead to a richer life, but when that life ends the real problem remains. On the other hand, the goal of the Church is to proclaim the liberating gospel of Jesus wherever we may find ourselves, to whoever will listen, accept His offer of freedom, and be transformed. We proclaim that liberty whether here in the land of the free and the home of the brave, or elsewhere in the land of the oppressed political slave. Our goal, our ministry, our purpose, our mandate—our mission. Proclaim the true liberty only available in Jesus. 

Life 7.9.2026

The opening section of the Declaration of Independence famously states…

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…”

    Regardless of debates about how self-evidential these truths are, or what exactly the founders meant by equality, or how far they intended to extend these “unalienable” rights, there is a discussion to be held regarding their theological propriety since they also drug “Their Creator” into the discussion. 

    I think it proper during this anniversary month to consider how life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness should be rightly considered from the perspective of Scripture. A central part of this discussion needs to wrestle with the fact that words—all words, at all times--need to be considered in their proper literary, social, cultural, psychological, and (if possible) spiritual context(s).  As much as we would like to just say “word x means y”, this gets us nowhere until we fully consider the context in which x is uttered. Hermeneutics is more than lexicography. Hermeneutics requires us to survey the intellectual geography surrounding a term to determine why an author (or authors) chose to use a term in a specific way. All authors are creatures of this “geographical” intellectual environment that typifies their time and place, and it is virtually impossible to replicate that intellectual landscape. This is why we must be particularly careful in interpreting any text whether a purely political (and dare we say propagandistic) document like the Declaration of Independence or more critically, our approach to Scripture. 

    Obviously, the founders recognized that a political entity—Colony, State, or Nation needed to provide some modicum of stability so that people could simply live. People needed to farm, work, raise their families, establish communities, educate young people, and worship. Clearly, the founders had concluded that the King and his government no longer could be trusted to guarantee the freedom to live and function. They saw life, within this context. So, they worked to provide a justification for a new political alignment in which the governed would assume the liability for their own lives. What seems to be common sense to us, was, to put it mildly, revolutionary in their century. Not just in the 13 colonies but in the rest of the world. 

    This perspective, largely derived from enlightenment thinking, challenged the status quo of thousands of years of reasoning regarding who was principally responsible for a nation’s life. Virtually everyone agreed that it was the responsibility of the sovereign. Now, for us, because of this Declaration of Independence, the responsibility for guaranteeing life and providing for community integrity comes down to the community; town, state, or nation. The people have become the guarantor of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Whilst this may be accurate from the perspective of political and social necessity it is separate from and unrelated to what the Bible asserts about the nature and character of the life we most need. 

    John, Elder, Apostle, and servant of Jesus didn’t know anything about this bootstrapping, new-fangled, citizenry that is defined by the Declaration. He was actually a royalist, albeit of a different kind than addressed by the founders. In the NT literature attributed to Him John uses the word “life” (ζωὴ) 59x. This term whether spoken by Jesus or used in narrative contexts is a central part of John’s presentation of the Gospel. It is a fitting point of contact. Consider some examples.

“In him was life, and the life was the light of men.” (John 1:4 ESV)

““For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16 ESV)

“Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.” (John 5:24 ESV)

“It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life (John 6:63 ESV)

"And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life.” (1 John 5:11-12 ESV)

“The Spirit and the Bride say, “Come.” And let the one who hears say, “Come.” And let the one who is thirsty come; let the one who desires take the water of life without price.”(Revelation 22:17 ESV)

    I realize that I have cited a significant body of Scripture. It is sufficient to establish the point that for John, and this is largely born out in the rest of the New Testament, life is found not in our political, social, racial, or cultural heritage but in Jesus—He who gave His life to redeem us. Our life—our entire being is in the Son. 

    In trying to make unfounded and unbiblical connections between the purely political, earthly, and imperial we lose our focus on the King in whose Kingdom we find not only earthly comfort but eternal redemption. 

    The USA is a wonderful country. There is no doubt that being an American is a tremendous blessing and that we possess enormous advantages that other nations do not. Privilege brings responsibility and enormous opportunity. We must be careful to not squander the latter in avoiding the former. 

    Yet individual humans die. Some nations and cultures have gone into extinction. Many of the places that nourished the Christian faith in its infancy are barren to it, even hostile in intent. Yet in other places it flourishes! Because the life of a nation may be its people, but the life of the Kingdom is the King who gave His own life to redeem us. As the Church changes and flourishes in new places the true life that we have in Jesus triumphs over all substitutes and fashionable facsimiles. As we share a national birthday it is right and good for us to remember that our faith-roots go far deeper than here and now. We share the inheritance of the Saints which transcends geography, nationality, and chronology to melt into the eternal life of God.